Kxx
x-direction reaction force caused by x displacement.
How oil-film reaction forces are linearised for critical-speed, unbalance-response and rotor-stability analysis.
A journal bearing does not behave like a simple steel spring and dashpot. Its hydrodynamic reaction force changes with shaft position, velocity, speed, load, lubricant condition and bearing geometry. Stiffness and damping coefficients are a local linear model of those force changes for small shaft motions about a calculated equilibrium.
For small perturbations, a common convention writes the bearing reaction as the negative sum of stiffness, damping and added-mass contributions.
Some software reports applied excitation force rather than bearing reaction force, reverses an axis or uses a different harmonic convention. The numeric signs can therefore differ even when the physical bearing is identical.
A common horizontal-machine convention uses x as the non-load axis and y as the load axis. Always verify the model definition.
The first subscript identifies the force direction. The second identifies the motion causing that force.
x-direction reaction force caused by x displacement.
x-direction reaction force caused by y displacement.
y-direction reaction force caused by x displacement.
y-direction reaction force caused by y displacement.
x-direction reaction force caused by x velocity.
x-direction reaction force caused by y velocity.
y-direction reaction force caused by x velocity.
y-direction reaction force caused by y velocity.
Controls how strongly the oil film reacts to displacement in the same axis. It influences bearing-supported natural frequencies, critical speeds, static orientation and mode shapes. Different Kxx and Kyy values indicate directional stiffness or orthotropy.
Relates reaction force to velocity in the same axis. It influences resonance amplification and how rapidly vibration energy is removed. A larger C value does not automatically mean more effective system damping because mode shape and stiffness also matter.
Connect motion in one axis with force in the other. Their signs and relative magnitudes can add or remove energy from a forward whirl. Tilting-pad bearings commonly reduce destabilising stiffness cross-coupling, but it must not be assumed to be exactly zero.
| Quantity | Common SI unit | Common scaled form | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stiffness K | N/m | MN/m | Incremental reaction force per unit displacement. |
| Damping C | N·s/m | kN·s/m | Incremental reaction force per unit relative velocity. |
| Added or virtual mass M | kg | kg | Incremental reaction force per unit relative acceleration. |
| Dynamic stiffness / impedance | N/m | MN/m, complex | Frequency-domain force-to-displacement relation combining K, C and M. |
| Dimensionless coefficients | No universal unit | Normalised | Scaled by a stated load, clearance, speed or geometry convention. The normalisation definition is essential. |
One common harmonic convention for dynamic stiffness. The sign of the imaginary term changes if the assumed time dependence changes, so the convention must accompany complex data.
A bearing coefficient table is a map of operating points, not a permanent nameplate property.
Journal speed, load magnitude and load angle determine equilibrium position and hydrodynamic pressure distribution.
Viscosity, inlet temperature, hot-oil carryover, flow regime and supply arrangement change film force and damping.
Hot assembled clearance, pad curvature and journal bearing preload strongly affect stiffness and damping.
Pad bending, pivot contact stiffness and carrier or housing compliance can sit in series with the oil-film stiffness.
Pad count, L/D ratio, pivot offset, load-on-pad or load-between-pad orientation and lubrication method all matter.
Excitation frequency, synchronous reduction and any retained pad degrees of freedom affect the coefficients supplied to the rotor model.
Tilting-pad bearings introduce pad motion, pivot flexibility and fluid inertia. Depending on the formulation, their journal-level coefficients may vary with perturbation frequency.
Texas A&M and GE testing reviewed by the Turbomachinery Laboratory found that direct real dynamic stiffness could often be represented as a quadratic function of frequency, with direct damping represented as approximately constant, by adding an [M] matrix to form a frequency-independent [K][C][M] model.
Suitable when the supplied coefficients and analysis method support a frequency-independent stiffness and damping representation.
Adds virtual or added mass to represent part of the measured frequency dependence without changing K and C at every frequency.
Shaft speed, static bearing load and load angle
x/y axis orientation and load-on-pad or load-between-pad arrangement
Dimensional units and any coefficient normalisation
Reaction-force sign and matrix subscript convention
Oil grade or viscosity, inlet temperature and lubrication condition
Hot clearance, preload and equilibrium shaft position
Perturbation frequency, synchronous reduction or [K][C][M] formulation
Thermal, pad, pivot, housing and turbulence assumptions used in the model
Establish equilibrium position, film thickness, pressure, temperature, flow and pad attitude at each operating point.
Apply small displacement and velocity perturbations, or a frequency-domain excitation, about that equilibrium.
Linearise the reaction forces into direct and cross-coupled K, C and, where required, M matrices.
Insert bearing matrices at the correct stations and coordinates with shaft, disks, seals, couplings and supports.
Calculate critical speeds, mode shapes, unbalance response, separation margins and stability over the operating range.
Comparing coefficients at different speed, load, oil temperature or clearance.
Swapping Kxy and Kyx or rotating axes without transforming the matrix.
Mixing N/m with MN/m, or dimensional values with normalised coefficients.
Assuming a positive damping number guarantees adequate rotor stability.
Using cold geometry when the coefficient model assumes hot operating clearance.
Ignoring frequency reduction, added mass, pivot stiffness or pad flexibility.
No. They describe the complete operating oil film and bearing structure about one equilibrium point. Lining, pad and pivot materials can influence them, but do not define them alone.
Load direction, shaft eccentricity, pad orientation and geometry make the bearing directionally asymmetric. This is commonly described as stiffness orthotropy.
Not as a standalone coefficient. Effective modal damping depends on stiffness, mode shape, cross-coupling and the complete rotor-bearing system.
Normally no. Coefficients should be calculated across the operating and transient range required by the rotor-dynamic study.
The force model and coefficient definitions were cross-checked against Texas A&M Turbomachinery Laboratory research on tilting-pad bearing force measurements, measured frequency characteristics, pad and pivot flexibility and the tutorial Fundamentals of Fluid Film Journal Bearing Operation and Modeling. This guide explains interpretation and does not provide machine-specific coefficients.
Send the bearing geometry, shaft data, operating envelope, lubricant conditions and rotor-dynamic requirements for an engineering review.